25. Dysfunction in phoneme categorisation

25. Dysfunction in phoneme categorisation

Classification and values follow different norms in the AS; normality does not exist, everything is unique, and the value of events and things is necessarily not the same as yours.

Something to reflect on: the question of perceiving and categorising phonemes, highlighting the idea that classification norms—that is, the criteria used to distinguish one sound from another, for example—are not universal. Here are a few key points to clarify this:

1. Variations in classification norms:

The principal formulation is considered “normal” or “correct” in the categorisation of expressions, which may vary according to the reference points used. Each individual may apply their own criteria.

2. The uniqueness of perceptual systems:

The expression “Everything is unique, and the value of events or things is not necessarily the same for everyone” emphasises that the perception and interpretation of sounds—and the expressions of things—rest on subjective mental constructions. In some cases, such as people with language disorders or neurodevelopmental particularities, the way these sounds are categorised may vary and is not a standard.

3. Linguistic implications and language disorders:

Disorders in phoneme categorisation highlight that the “normed” or standardised allistic approach is not always the most suitable for understanding and helping each individual. The allistic “norms” used can be seen as conventions that do not correspond to the reality of someone who is different, or to their perceptual or cognitive system. The functioning of “the AS” and their reference points often differ from the norm and vary with particular contexts.

In sum, this passage highlights the relativity of categorisation criteria, reminding us that the uniqueness of perceptual experience means there is no absolute normality in interpretation.